Finance as Extended Biology: Reciprocity as the Cognitive Substrate of Financial Behavior

Position Paper

1National Taiwan University
Project teaser

TL/DR:  We propose a cognitively grounded theory of finance: its origins lie not in institutions or cultural design, but in the fundamental logic of reciprocity. Trade—often seen as the starting point of financial systems—is reframed as the canonical form of reciprocity. From this behavioral substrate, we derive credit, insurance, token exchange, and investment as structured extensions under varying conditions.

Credit

Credit
Delayed reciprocation.

Insurance

Insurance
Mutual support under uncertainty.

Token-exchange

Token-exchange
Indirect reciprocation via tokens.

Investment

Investment
Future-oriented reciprocation.

Abstract

A central challenge in economics and artificial intelligence is explaining how financial behaviors—such as credit, insurance, and trade—emerge without formal institutions. We argue that these functions are not products of institutional design, but structured extensions of a single behavioral substrate: reciprocity. Far from being a derived strategy, reciprocity served as the foundational logic of early human societies—governing the circulation of goods, regulation of obligation, and maintenance of long-term cooperation well before markets, money, or formal rules.

Trade, commonly regarded as the origin of financial systems, is reframed here as the canonical form of reciprocity: simultaneous, symmetric, and partner-contingent. Building on this logic, we reconstruct four core financial functions—credit, insurance, token exchange, and investment—as expressions of the same underlying principle under varying conditions.

By grounding financial behavior in minimal, simulateable dynamics of reciprocal interaction, this framework shifts the focus from institutional engineering to behavioral computation—offering a new foundation for modeling decentralized financial behavior in both human and artificial agents.

3 Source Evidence

Project teaser

Financial Interpretation with Reciprocity

Financial Function Reciprocity Extension Behavioral Logic of Finance
Credit Delayed reciprocation I help you today, and you return the favor later.
Insurance Mutual support under uncertainty I help you now, trusting you’ll help me if I’m ever in trouble.
Token Exchange Indirect reciprocation via tokens I help a stranger, and someone else helps me later—with a token to keep track.
Investment Future-oriented reciprocation I give you something now, expecting you’ll return more in the future.

Why It Matters?

Despite centuries of financial theory, the true origins of core financial behaviors—like credit, insurance, and investment—remain underspecified. Most models assume formal contracts, utility-maximizing agents, or symbolic trust, but rarely explain how these systems arise from real social behavior.

This missing foundation isn’t just theoretical. It limits our ability to design artificial agents or systems that can engage in decentralized finance in a stable, scalable way. Without grounding in memory, expectation, and behavioral payoff, “trust” becomes a placeholder, not a mechanism.

By modeling finance as a structured extension of basic cognitive capacities—rather than as a product of institutional design—we offer a new way to simulate how financial functions emerge from social interaction and reciprocal behavior.

Implementation Outlook

This framework is designed to be simulateable from the ground up. Each of the three behavioral primitives—partner recognition, reciprocal credence, and cost–return sensitivity—can be implemented as modular memory structures within LLM-based agents.

Instead of relying on reinforcement learning or fixed policy rules, agents maintain identity-indexed memory logs, scalar expectations shaped by prior outcomes, and adaptive heuristics for evaluating when and how to cooperate. These mechanisms support the emergence of distinct financial behaviors—such as credit, insurance, token exchange, and investment—as structured expressions of reciprocity under different conditions, including time delay, risk asymmetry, indirect mediation, and expected future return.

These components can be layered into existing multi-agent environments through structured memory and prompt-level reasoning. This allows scalable simulation of how complex financial behaviors emerge from simple social interaction dynamics—without institutional scaffolding.

Demo

Project teaser

Exploring This Direction?

We welcome feedback, ideas, or collaborative exploration in simulateable finance, behavioral economics, social simulation, and AI systems grounded in human interaction. Reach out via egil158@gmail.com.